Detectability of Chlorofluorocarbons in the Atmospheres of Habitable M-dwarf Planets
Jacob Haqq-Misra, Ravi Kopparapu, Thomas J. Fauchez, Adam Frank, Jason, T. Wright, Manasvi Lingam1

TL;DR
This study assesses the potential for detecting chlorofluorocarbons, as technosignatures, in the atmospheres of habitable M-dwarf exoplanets using JWST, highlighting the feasibility and limitations based on noise levels and observation time.
Contribution
It introduces a method to evaluate the detectability of CFCs as technosignatures on exoplanets using climate modeling and synthetic spectra, considering JWST capabilities.
Findings
CFCs could be detectable around TRAPPIST-1e with optimistic noise assumptions.
Detection of Earth-level CFCs requires about 100 hours of observation.
Non-detection can set upper limits on CFC concentrations.
Abstract
The presence of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in Earth's atmosphere is a direct result of technology. Ozone-depleting CFCs have been banned by most countries, but some CFCs have persistent in elevated concentrations due to their long stratospheric lifetimes. CFCs are effective greenhouse gases and could serve as a remotely detectable spectral signature of technology. Here we use a three-dimensional climate model and a synthetic spectrum generator to assess the detectability of CFC-11 and CFC-12 as a technosignature on exoplanets. We consider the case of TRAPPIST-1e as well as a habitable Earth-like planet around a 3300 K M-dwarf star, with CFC abundances ranging from one to five times present-day levels. Assuming an optimistic James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Mid Infrared Instrument (MIRI) low resolution spectrometer (LRS) noise floor level of 10 ppm to multiple co-added observations, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
