Weak and Strong Versions of Effective Transfinite Recursion
Patrick Uftring

TL;DR
This paper characterizes the strength of two definitions of Effective Transfinite Recursion in reverse mathematics and establishes an equivalence between $ ext{Pi}^0_2$-induction along a well-order and the well-foundedness of exponentiated well-orders.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of two definitions of Effective Transfinite Recursion and links $ ext{Pi}^0_2$-induction to well-foundedness of exponentiated well-orders.
Findings
Characterization of the strength of two Effective Transfinite Recursion definitions.
Equivalence between $ ext{Pi}^0_2$-induction along a well-order and well-foundedness of exponentiated well-orders.
Abstract
Working in the context of reverse mathematics, we give a fine-grained characterization result on the strength of two possible definitions for Effective Transfinite Recursion used in literature. Moreover, we show that -induction along a well-order is equivalent to the statement that the exponentiation of any well-order to the power of is well-founded.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
