Substructures in Latin squares

TL;DR

This paper proves the existence of Latin squares with high girth, analyzes the probability of intercalates, and studies substructure counts, advancing understanding of Latin square properties and their combinatorial complexity.

Contribution

It adapts recent methods to Latin squares, resolving a conjecture on high girth, and provides large-deviation results for intercalates and substructure counts.

Findings

Existence of Latin squares with arbitrarily high girth.

Probability bounds for the number of intercalates in random Latin squares.

Order-$n$ Latin squares typically contain the minimal number of cuboctahedra.

Abstract

We prove several results about substructures in Latin squares. First, we explain how to adapt our recent work on high-girth Steiner triple systems to the setting of Latin squares, resolving a conjecture of Linial that there exist Latin squares with arbitrarily high girth. As a consequence, we see that the number of order-$n$ Latin squares with no intercalate (i.e., no $2\times2$ Latin subsquare) is at least $(e^{-9/4}n-o(n))^{n^{2}}$. Equivalently, $\mathbb{P}\left[\mathbf{N}=0\right]\ge e^{-n^{2}/4-o(n^{2})}=e^{-(1+o(1))\mathbb{E}\mathbf{N}}$, where $\mathbf{N}$ is the number of intercalates in a uniformly random order-$n$ Latin square. In fact, extending recent work of Kwan, Sah, and Sawhney, we resolve the general large-deviation problem for intercalates in random Latin squares, up to constant factors in the exponent: for any constant $0<\delta\le1$ we have $\mathbb{P}[\mathbf{N}\le(1-\delta)\mathbb{E}\mathbf{N}]=\exp(-\Theta(n^{2}))$ and for any constant $\delta>0$ we have $\mathbb{P}[\mathbf{N}\ge(1+\delta)\mathbb{E}\mathbf{N}]=\exp(-\Theta(n^{4/3}\log n))$. Finally, as an application of some new general tools for studying substructures in random Latin squares, we show that in almost all order-$n$ Latin squares, the number of cuboctahedra (i.e., the number of pairs of possibly degenerate $2\times2$ submatrices with the same arrangement of symbols) is of order $n^{4}$, which is the minimum possible. As observed by Gowers and Long, this number can be interpreted as measuring ``how associative'' the quasigroup associated with the Latin square is.