The Gaia-ESO Survey: Age-chemical-clock relations spatially resolved in the Galactic disc
C. Viscasillas V\'azquez, L. Magrini, G. Casali, G., Tautvai\v{s}ien\.e, L. Spina, M. Van der Swaelmen, S. Randich, T. Bensby, A., Bragaglia, E. Friel, S. Feltzing, G.G. Sacco, A. Turchi, F., Jim\'enez-Esteban, V. D'Orazi, E. Delgado-Mena, \v{S}. Mikolaitis, A., Drazdauskas

TL;DR
This study extends the use of chemical clocks to map stellar ages across the Galactic disc, revealing radial variations and the non-universality of age-abundance relations, crucial for understanding galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It calibrates and analyzes spatially resolved age-chemical relations using Gaia-ESO data, highlighting their dependence on galactocentric distance and metallicity.
Findings
Chemical clocks vary with galactic radius.
No universal age-abundance relation exists across the disc.
[Ba/$ extalpha$] ratios are more sensitive to age than [Y/$ extalpha$].
Abstract
The last decade has seen a revolution in our knowledge of the Galaxy thanks to the Gaia and asteroseismic space missions and the ground-based spectroscopic surveys. To complete this picture, it is necessary to map the ages of its stellar populations. During recent years, the dependence on time of abundance ratios involving slow (s) neutron-capture and elements (called chemical-clocks) has been used to provide estimates of stellar ages, usually in a limited volume close to the Sun. We aim to analyse the relations of chemical clocks in the Galactic disc extending the range to R6-20~kpc. Using the sixth internal data release of the Gaia-ESO survey, we calibrated several relations between stellar ages and abundance ratios [s/] using a sample of open clusters, the largest one so far used with this aim. Thanks to their wide galactocentric coverage, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
