Reproducibility in Optimization: Theoretical Framework and Limits
Kwangjun Ahn, Prateek Jain, Ziwei Ji, Satyen Kale, Praneeth, Netrapalli, Gil I. Shamir

TL;DR
This paper develops a formal framework to quantify and analyze the limits of reproducibility in optimization procedures, revealing a fundamental trade-off between computational effort and reproducibility in various convex settings.
Contribution
It introduces a quantitative measure of reproducibility and establishes tight bounds on its limits across different convex optimization scenarios.
Findings
Reproducibility bounds vary across convex optimization types.
More computation improves reproducibility, indicating a trade-off.
The framework formalizes reproducibility in noisy or error-prone optimization contexts.
Abstract
We initiate a formal study of reproducibility in optimization. We define a quantitative measure of reproducibility of optimization procedures in the face of noisy or error-prone operations such as inexact or stochastic gradient computations or inexact initialization. We then analyze several convex optimization settings of interest such as smooth, non-smooth, and strongly-convex objective functions and establish tight bounds on the limits of reproducibility in each setting. Our analysis reveals a fundamental trade-off between computation and reproducibility: more computation is necessary (and sufficient) for better reproducibility.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
