The Absurdity of Death Estimates Based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
Gordon V Cormack, Maura R Grossman

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the methodology used to estimate COVID vaccine-related deaths from VAERS data, revealing fundamental flaws that challenge the validity of such claims.
Contribution
It exposes a core logical fallacy in the interpretation of VAERS data for estimating vaccine-related mortality.
Findings
VAERS data analysis is based on a flawed assumption.
The claimed death toll from COVID vaccines is not supported by proper statistical reasoning.
The paper advocates for more rigorous methods in vaccine safety assessment.
Abstract
We demonstrate from first principles a core fallacy employed by a coterie of authors who claim that data from the Vaccine Adverse Reporting System (VAERS) show that hundreds of thousands of U.S. deaths are attributable to COVID vaccination.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · COVID-19 epidemiological studies
