TL;DR
This study compares traditional schlieren and background-oriented schlieren (BOS) optical velocimetry techniques for measuring the velocity fields of turbulent helium jets in air, highlighting the advantages of kymography over digital image correlation.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of schlieren and BOS velocimetry methods, demonstrating the effectiveness of kymography in capturing jet velocity dynamics.
Findings
Kymography outperforms DIC in velocity measurement accuracy.
Both methods partially capture jet self-similarity and spreading rate.
Kymography's spatiotemporal spectrum helps distinguish eddy velocities.
Abstract
Seedless velocimetry is gaining interest in many industrial and research applications. We report on a comparative study of time-resolved optical velocimetry using traditional, mirror-type knife-edge schlieren optics versus Background-Oriented Schlieren (BOS) of subsonic round turbulent helium jets in air at Red = 5,890 and 11,300. Digital images with 1024 pixels streamwise resolution (0 < x/d < 200) were captured at 6000 frames/s in large ensembles. Velocimetry was performed on these results by digital image correlation (DIC) using OpenPIV software, and by streak-schlieren analysis of x-t diagrams (kymography). Limited PIV data were also collected for verification of the schlieren velocimetry results. Both BOS and traditional schlieren show partial success in measuring the mean-flow helium jet self-similarity in terms of the 1/x decay of centerline velocity, Gaussian-shaped radial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
