Is Local $H_0$ At Odds With Dark Energy EFT?
Bum-Hoon Lee, Wonwoo Lee, Eoin \'O Colg\'ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and, Somyadip Thakur

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether dark energy models within effective field theories can reconcile the discrepancy between local and early universe measurements of the Hubble constant, finding limited potential for such models to resolve the tension.
Contribution
It demonstrates that standard dark energy EFT models cannot significantly increase the Hubble constant to match local measurements, highlighting limitations of these theories in resolving the Hubble tension.
Findings
EoS with $w_{DE}(z=0)<-1$ can raise $H_0$ modestly
Quintessence and K-essence do not satisfy conditions to increase $H_0$
Dark energy EFT models cannot outperform phenomenological two-parameter models in increasing $H_0$
Abstract
Local determinations currently fall in a window between km/s/Mpc (TRGB) and km/s/Mpc (Tully-Fisher). In contrast, BAO data calibrated in an early CDM universe are largely consistent with Planck-CDM, km/s/Mpc. Employing a generic two parameter family of evolving equations of state (EoS) for dark energy (DE) and mock BAO data, we demonstrate that if i) and ii) integrated DE density less than CDM, then increases. EoS that violate these conditions at best lead to modest increases within . Tellingly, Quintessence and K-essence satisfy neither condition, whereas coupled Quintessence can only satisfy ii). Beyond these seminal DE Effective Field Theories (EFTs), we turn to explicit examples. Working model agnostically in an expansion in powers of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
