Biases in estimates of black hole kicks from the spin distribution of binary black holes
Simon Stevenson

TL;DR
This paper challenges previous claims that large black hole kicks are necessary to explain observed spin distributions, showing that more typical kicks of around 100 km/s suffice when considering wider binaries with less tidal spin-up.
Contribution
It demonstrates that accounting for wider binaries without effective tidal synchronization alters spin distribution interpretations, reducing the need for large black hole kicks.
Findings
Typical black hole kicks are around 100 km/s.
Bimodal spin distribution arises from wider binary populations.
Most binary black holes are consistent with isolated binary evolution.
Abstract
A population of more than 50 binary black hole mergers has now been observed by the LIGO and Virgo gravitational-wave observatories. While neutron stars are known to have large velocities associated with impulsive kicks imparted to them at birth in supernovae, whether black holes receive similar kicks, and of what magnitude, remains an open question. Recently, Callister et al. (2021) analysed the binary black hole population under the hypothesis that they were all formed through isolated binary evolution and claimed that large black hole kicks (greater than 260 km/s at 99% confidence) were required for the spin distribution of merging binary black holes to match observations. Here we highlight that a key assumption made by Callister et al. (2021) -- that all secondary black holes can be tidally spun up -- is not motivated by physical models, and may lead to a bias in their estimate of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
