Think-Aloud Verbalizations for Identifying User Experience Problems: Effects of Language Proficiency with Chinese Non-Native English Speakers
Mingming Fan, Lingyun Zhu

TL;DR
This study investigates whether Chinese non-native English speakers' think-aloud verbalizations reveal UX problems similarly to native speakers, finding comparable patterns and implications for AI-assisted UX analysis tools.
Contribution
It provides the first comparative analysis of native and non-native English speakers' think-aloud verbalizations in UX testing, informing AI tool design.
Findings
Similar verbalization patterns between native and non-native speakers
Language proficiency does not significantly alter verbalization-problem correlations
TA protocols have minimal impact on verbalization patterns
Abstract
Subtle patterns in users' think-aloud (TA) verbalizations (i.e., utterances) are shown to be telltale signs of user experience (UX) problems and used to build artificial intelligence (AI) models or AI-assisted tools to help UX evaluators identify UX problems automatically or semi-automatically. Despite the potential of such verbalization patterns, they were uncovered with native English speakers. As most people who speak English are non-native speakers, it is important to investigate whether similar patterns exist in non-native English speakers' TA verbalizations. As a first step to answer this question, we conducted think-aloud usability testing with Chinese non-native English speakers and native English speakers using three common TA protocols. We compared their verbalizations and UX problems that they encountered to understand the effects of language and TA protocols. Our findings…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
