The case for Zero Trust Digital Forensics
Christoper Neale, Ian Kennedy, Blain Price, Bashar Nuseibeh

TL;DR
This paper advocates for applying Zero Trust principles to digital forensics, emphasizing verification over trust to enhance reliability and prevent tampering in investigations.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of Zero Trust Digital Forensics, defining its principles and demonstrating how it can mitigate evidence tampering risks in investigations.
Findings
Proposes a Zero Trust approach to digital forensics.
Defines multifaceted verification of digital artefacts.
Shows potential to improve investigation reliability.
Abstract
It is imperative for all stakeholders that digital forensics investigations produce reliable results to ensure the field delivers a positive contribution to the pursuit of justice across the globe. Some aspects of these investigations are inevitably contingent on trust, however this is not always explicitly considered or critically evaluated. Erroneously treating features of the investigation as trusted can be enormously damaging to the overall reliability of an investigations findings as well as the confidence that external stakeholders can have in it. As an example, digital crime scenes can be manipulated by tampering with the digital artefacts left on devices, yet recent studies have shown that efforts to detect occurrences of this are rare and argue that this leaves digital forensics investigations vulnerable to accusations of inaccuracy. In this paper a new approach to digital…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
