Directional-dependence of the event-by-event neutron-$\gamma$ multiplicity correlations in $^{252}$Cf(sf)
Stefano Marin, Eoin P. Sansevero, M. Stephan Okar, Isabel E., Hernandez, Shaun D. Clarke, Ramona L. Vogt, Jorgen Randrup, Vladimir A., Protopopescu, Sara A. Pozzi

TL;DR
This study investigates how neutron and gamma-ray emissions in $^{252}$Cf spontaneous fission depend on emission energies and directions, revealing correlations with fragment angular momentum and excitation energy, and providing insights into fission dynamics.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of directional and energy-dependent neutron-gamma correlations in $^{252}$Cf(sf), highlighting their relation to fragment angular momentum and excitation.
Findings
Neutron emission enhances gamma emission at 0.7 and 1.2 MeV.
Directional gamma emission aligned with neutrons at energies ≤0.7 MeV.
Statistical gamma rays are emitted isotropically, indicating small angular momentum transfer.
Abstract
We differentiate the event-by-event n- multiplicity data from \ce{^{252}Cf}(sf) with respect to the energies of the emitted particles as well as their relative angles of emission. We determine that neutron emission enhances -ray emission around and MeV, but the only directional alignment was observed for MeV and tended to be parallel and antiparallel to neutrons emitted in the same event. The emission of rays at other energies was determined to be nearly isotropic. The presence of the emission and alignment enhancements is explained by positive correlations between neutron emission and quadrupole -ray emission along rotational bands in the de-exciting fragments. This observation corroborates the hypothesis of positive correlations between the angular momentum of a fragment and its intrinsic excitation energy. The results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
