GRB 210217A: A short or a long GRB?
Dimple, Kuntal Misra, Ankur Ghosh, K. G. Arun, Rahul Gupta, Amit, Kumar, L. Resmi, S. B. Pandey, and Lallan Yadav

TL;DR
This study analyzes GRB 210217A, which exhibits ambiguous characteristics of both short and long gamma-ray bursts, using multi-wavelength data and various classification criteria to determine its true nature.
Contribution
The paper presents a comprehensive multi-wavelength analysis of an ambiguous GRB, combining different classification methods to assess its true short or long nature.
Findings
GRB 210217A shows properties of both short and long GRBs.
Multi-wavelength analysis suggests ambiguity in its classification.
The burst's placement in the Amati plane supports its ambiguous nature.
Abstract
Gamma-ray bursts are traditionally classified as short and long bursts based on their value (the time interval during which an instrument observes to of gamma-ray/hard X-ray fluence). However, is dependent on the detector sensitivity and the energy range in which the instrument operates. As a result, different instruments provide different values of for a burst. GRB 210217A is detected with different duration by {\it Swift} and {\it Fermi}. It is classified as a long/soft GRB by {\it Swift}-BAT with a value of 3.76 sec. On the other hand, the sub-threshold detection by {\it Fermi}-GBM classified GRB 210217A as a short/hard burst with a duration of 1.024 sec. We present the multi-wavelength analysis of GRB 210217A (lying in the overlapping regime of long and short GRBs) to identify its actual class using multi-wavelength…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
