Opted Out, Yet Tracked: Are Regulations Enough to Protect Your Privacy?
Zengrui Liu, Umar Iqbal, Nitesh Saxena

TL;DR
This study reveals that despite regulations and consent platforms, many advertisers still collect and share user data without proper consent, highlighting gaps in current privacy protections.
Contribution
The paper introduces an auditing framework to empirically evaluate compliance of advertisers with user consent under GDPR and CCPA.
Findings
Many advertisers collect data despite user opt-out.
Some CMPs better convey user consent than others.
Advertiser opt-outs are often ineffective in protecting privacy.
Abstract
Data protection regulations, such as GDPR and CCPA, require websites and embedded third-parties, especially advertisers, to seek user consent before they can collect and process user data. Only when the users opt in, can these entities collect, process, and share user data. Websites typically incorporate Consent Management Platforms (CMPs), such as OneTrust and CookieBot, to solicit and convey user consent to the embedded advertisers, with the expectation that the consent will be respected. However, neither the websites nor the regulators currently have any mechanism to audit advertisers' compliance with the user consent, i.e., to determine if advertisers indeed do not collect, process, and share user data when the user opts out. In this paper, we propose an auditing framework that leverages advertisers' bidding behavior to empirically assess the violations of data protection…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
