Network Hierarchy and Pattern Recovery in Directed Sparse Hopfield Networks
Niall Rodgers, Peter Tino, Samuel Johnson

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the hierarchical structure of directed, sparse Hopfield networks influences their pattern recovery capabilities, revealing that controlling trophic coherence and identifying key nodes enhances performance.
Contribution
It introduces the use of Trophic Analysis to characterize hierarchy in neural networks and demonstrates how network topology affects pattern recovery and control.
Findings
Small subset of neurons can control the system based on trophic levels.
Tuning trophic coherence improves pattern recovery performance.
Hierarchical structure insights relate to biological and artificial networks.
Abstract
Many real-world networks are directed, sparse and hierarchical, with a mixture of feed-forward and feedback connections with respect to the hierarchy. Moreover, a small number of 'master' nodes are often able to drive the whole system. We study the dynamics of pattern presentation and recovery on sparse, directed, Hopfield-like neural networks using Trophic Analysis to characterise their hierarchical structure. This is a recent method which quantifies the local position of each node in a hierarchy (trophic level) as well as the global directionality of the network (trophic coherence). We show that even in a recurrent network, the state of the system can be controlled by a small subset of neurons which can be identified by their low trophic levels. We also find that performance at the pattern recovery task can be significantly improved by tuning the trophic coherence and other…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
