Improved XTZ masses and mass ratios from Laplace Sum Rules at NLO
R. Albuquerque (FAT-UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Br), S. Narison, (LUPM-CNRS/IN2P3 Montpellier, FR, iHEPMAD, Antananarivo, MG), D., Rabetiarivony (iHEPMAD, Antananarivo, MG)

TL;DR
This paper improves estimates of heavy tetraquark and molecule state masses using advanced QCD sum rules, providing more precise predictions and insights into their nature, including stability and composition, with comparisons to other models.
Contribution
It introduces refined NLO QCD Laplace sum rule techniques with combined ratios for more accurate mass and coupling predictions of exotic states.
Findings
X_c(3872) and Z_c(3900) are tetramole states with predicted masses around 3876 and 3900 MeV.
Predicted masses for T_{cc}^{1^+} and T_{cc}^{0^+} are 3886(6) MeV and 3883(3) MeV respectively.
Some T_{bbqq'} states are nearly stable against strong decays.
Abstract
We present improved estimates of the couplings, masses and mass ratios of the Z_Q,X_Q and T_{QQqq} states using QCD Laplace sum rules (LSR), their ratios R and double ratios DRSR within stability criteria, where the NLO factorized PT QCD corrections are included which is important for giving a meaning on the running MS heavy quark mass used in the analysis. We show that combined R and DRSR can provide more precise results. First, we conclude that the observed X_c(3872) and Z_c(3900) are tetramoles states (superposition of quasi-degenerated molecule and a tetraquark states having (almost) the same coupling to the currents) with the predicted masses: M_{T_{X_c}}=3876(44) MeV and M_{ T_{Z_c}}=3900(42) MeV. In the 2nd part, we focus on the analysis of the four-quark nature of different T_{QQqq'} 1^+ and 0^+ states within the 3_c3_c interpolating currents. The final results are summarized in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
