Corpus for Automatic Structuring of Legal Documents
Prathamesh Kalamkar, Aman Tiwari, Astha Agarwal, Saurabh Karn, and Smita Gupta, Vivek Raghavan, Ashutosh Modi

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new annotated corpus of legal judgment documents in English, with rhetorical role labels, to facilitate automatic structuring, summarization, and prediction tasks in legal NLP.
Contribution
It presents a novel corpus with rhetorical role annotations for legal documents and baseline models for role prediction, aiding legal document processing.
Findings
Corpus enables better legal document organization
Baseline models improve role prediction accuracy
Application enhances summarization and judgment prediction
Abstract
In populous countries, pending legal cases have been growing exponentially. There is a need for developing techniques for processing and organizing legal documents. In this paper, we introduce a new corpus for structuring legal documents. In particular, we introduce a corpus of legal judgment documents in English that are segmented into topical and coherent parts. Each of these parts is annotated with a label coming from a list of pre-defined Rhetorical Roles. We develop baseline models for automatically predicting rhetorical roles in a legal document based on the annotated corpus. Further, we show the application of rhetorical roles to improve performance on the tasks of summarization and legal judgment prediction. We release the corpus and baseline model code along with the paper.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Law · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
