XNLP-completeness for Parameterized Problems on Graphs with a Linear Structure
Hans L. Bodlaender, Carla Groenland, Hugo Jacob, Lars Jaffke, and Paloma T. Lima

TL;DR
This paper establishes XNLP-completeness for several classical graph problems parameterized by linear width measures, indicating their computational hardness and space complexity implications.
Contribution
It proves XNLP-completeness for multiple problems parameterized by linear width measures, strengthening hardness results and suggesting high space requirements for XP algorithms.
Findings
XNLP-hardness for problems parameterized by pathwidth, linear clique-width, and linear mim-width.
Implication that XP algorithms for these problems likely require XP space.
Strengthening of existing W[1]-hardness proofs for these problems.
Abstract
In this paper, we showcase the class XNLP as a natural place for many hard problems parameterized by linear width measures. This strengthens existing -hardness proofs for these problems, since XNLP-hardness implies -hardness for all . It also indicates, via a conjecture by Pilipczuk and Wrochna [ToCT 2018], that any XP algorithm for such problems is likely to require XP space. In particular, we show XNLP-completeness for natural problems parameterized by pathwidth, linear clique-width, and linear mim-width. The problems we consider are Independent Set, Dominating Set, Odd Cycle Transversal, (-)Coloring, Max Cut, Maximum Regular Induced Subgraph, Feedback Vertex Set, Capacitated (Red-Blue) Dominating Set, and Bipartite Bandwidth.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
