TL;DR
This paper links distributionally robust optimization-based graphical model selection to family-wise error rate control, demonstrating its effectiveness through theory, simulations, and real data analysis.
Contribution
It establishes a theoretical connection between DRO-based graphical model selection confidence levels and family-wise error rate, enhancing error control understanding.
Findings
DRO formulation controls family-wise error rate asymptotically.
Simulation results confirm finite-sample error rate control.
Real data analysis demonstrates practical utility.
Abstract
Recently, a special case of precision matrix estimation based on a distributionally robust optimization (DRO) framework has been shown to be equivalent to the graphical lasso. From this formulation, a method for choosing the regularization term, i.e., for graphical model selection, was proposed. In this work, we establish a theoretical connection between the confidence level of graphical model selection via the DRO formulation and the asymptotic family-wise error rate of estimating false edges. Simulation experiments and real data analyses illustrate the utility of the asymptotic family-wise error rate control behavior even in finite samples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
