Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in Private (Deep) Learning
Chuan Guo, Brian Karrer, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Laurens van der Maaten

TL;DR
This paper establishes formal semantic guarantees for differential privacy mechanisms, demonstrating their effectiveness in preventing training data reconstruction attacks in machine learning models.
Contribution
It introduces the first semantic guarantees for DP against data reconstruction attacks, analyzing Renyi differential privacy and Fisher information leakage as protective measures.
Findings
Renyi differential privacy provides strong semantic protection.
Fisher information leakage effectively limits data reconstruction risks.
Both methods enhance understanding of privacy guarantees in ML models.
Abstract
Differential privacy is widely accepted as the de facto method for preventing data leakage in ML, and conventional wisdom suggests that it offers strong protection against privacy attacks. However, existing semantic guarantees for DP focus on membership inference, which may overestimate the adversary's capabilities and is not applicable when membership status itself is non-sensitive. In this paper, we derive the first semantic guarantees for DP mechanisms against training data reconstruction attacks under a formal threat model. We show that two distinct privacy accounting methods -- Renyi differential privacy and Fisher information leakage -- both offer strong semantic protection against data reconstruction attacks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Cryptography and Data Security · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
