The Galactic Dust-Up: Modeling Dust Evolution in FIRE
Caleb R. Choban, Dusan Keres, Philip F. Hopkins, Karin M. Sandstrom,, Christopher C. Hayward, Claude-Andre Faucher-Giguere

TL;DR
This paper introduces and compares two detailed dust evolution models integrated into galaxy simulations, highlighting the importance of chemically motivated and specific dust species modeling to match observed dust properties.
Contribution
It presents two novel dust evolution models ('Elemental' and 'Species') within FIRE-2 simulations, emphasizing the need for chemically motivated and specific dust species for accurate predictions.
Findings
Both models produce reasonable dust-to-metals ratios.
Gas-dust accretion is identified as the main dust growth mechanism.
Chemically motivated models better reproduce observed element depletions.
Abstract
Recent strides have been made developing dust evolution models for galaxy formation simulations but these approaches vary in their assumptions and degree of complexity. Here we introduce and compare two separate dust evolution models (labelled 'Elemental' and 'Species'), based on recent approaches, incorporated into the GIZMO code and coupled with FIRE-2 stellar feedback and ISM physics. Both models account for turbulent dust diffusion, stellar production of dust, dust growth via gas-dust accretion, and dust destruction from time-resolved supernovae, thermal sputtering in hot gas, and astration. The "Elemental" model tracks the evolution of generalized dust species and utilizes a simple, 'tunable' dust growth routine, while the "Species" model tracks the evolution of specific dust species with set chemical compositions and incorporates a physically motivated, two-phase dust growth…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
