Operator relationship between conventional coupled cluster and unitary coupled cluster
James K. Freericks

TL;DR
This paper establishes an exact operator-level relationship between conventional and unitary coupled cluster methods using algebraic identities, aiding quantum chemistry computations.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic operator manipulation approach to relate and transform between conventional and unitary coupled cluster ansatzes.
Findings
Operator manipulations relate the two methods explicitly.
Trotter formula connects factorized forms to standard ansatz.
Higher-rank operators can convert between methods.
Abstract
The chemistry community has long sought the exact relationship between the conventional and the unitary coupled cluster ansatz for a single-reference system, especially given the interest in performing quantum chemistry on quantum computers. In this work, we show how one can use the operator manipulations given by the exponential disentangling identity and the Hadamard lemma to relate the factorized form of the unitary coupled-cluster approximation to a factorized form of the conventional coupled cluster approximation (the factorized form is required, because some amplitudes are operator-valued and do not commute with other terms). By employing the Trotter product formula, one can then relate the factorized form to the standard form of the unitary coupled cluster ansatz. The operator dependence of the factorized form of the coupled cluster approximation can also be removed at the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum many-body systems · Matrix Theory and Algorithms · Machine Learning in Materials Science
