Representations learnt by SGD and Adaptive learning rules: Conditions that vary sparsity and selectivity in neural networks
Jin Hyun Park

TL;DR
This paper explores how different training conditions, like learning rate and batch size, naturally increase sparsity and selectivity in neural networks, providing insights relevant to both neuroscience and machine learning.
Contribution
It identifies specific training conditions that promote sparsity and selectivity in neural networks, a novel investigation into their natural occurrence.
Findings
Large learning rate increases sparsity and selectivity.
Lowering batch size enhances sparsity and selectivity.
Sparsity and selectivity relate to test accuracy.
Abstract
From the point of view of the human brain, continual learning can perform various tasks without mutual interference. An effective way to reduce mutual interference can be found in sparsity and selectivity of neurons. According to Aljundi et al. and Hadsell et al., imposing sparsity at the representational level is advantageous for continual learning because sparse neuronal activations encourage less overlap between parameters, resulting in less interference. Similarly, highly selective neural networks are likely to induce less interference since particular response in neurons will reduce the chance of overlap with other parameters. Considering that the human brain performs continual learning over the lifespan, finding conditions where sparsity and selectivity naturally arises may provide insight for understanding how the brain functions. This paper investigates various conditions that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications · Machine Learning and ELM
