Bootstrap inference for fixed-effect models
Ayden Higgins, Koen Jochmans

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the parametric bootstrap can accurately replicate the distribution of the maximum-likelihood estimator in fixed-effect models, enabling valid inference without bias correction.
Contribution
It shows that bootstrap methods can be used directly for inference in fixed-effect models, bypassing the need for bias correction techniques.
Findings
Bootstrap replicates the distribution of the MLE in large samples.
Standard bootstrap confidence sets are justified without bias adjustment.
No bias correction is necessary for valid inference.
Abstract
The maximum-likelihood estimator of nonlinear panel data models with fixed effects is consistent but asymptotically-biased under rectangular-array asymptotics. The literature has thus far concentrated its effort on devising methods to correct the maximum-likelihood estimator for its bias as a means to salvage standard inferential procedures. Instead, we show that the parametric bootstrap replicates the distribution of the (uncorrected) maximum-likelihood estimator in large samples. This justifies the use of confidence sets constructed via standard bootstrap percentile methods. No adjustment for the presence of bias needs to be made.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpatial and Panel Data Analysis · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
