Doers, not Watchers: Intelligent Autonomous Agents are a Path to Cyber Resilience
Alexander Kott, Paul Theron

TL;DR
This paper advocates for transforming cyber defense tools from passive watchers into active autonomous agents capable of rapid response and recovery to enhance cyber resilience.
Contribution
It explores the vision of autonomous intelligent cyber defense agents (AICA) and discusses a high-level reference architecture for such systems.
Findings
Highlights the limitations of current passive cyber defense tools.
Proposes the integration of autonomous response and recovery capabilities.
Discusses the potential benefits of AI-driven active cyber defense agents.
Abstract
Today's cyber defense tools are mostly watchers. They are not active doers. To be sure, watching too is a demanding affair. These tools monitor the traffic and events; they detect malicious signatures, patterns and anomalies; they might classify and characterize what they observe; they issue alerts, and they might even learn while doing all this. But they don't act. They do little to plan and execute responses to attacks, and they don't plan and execute recovery activities. Response and recovery - core elements of cyber resilience are left to the human cyber analysts, incident responders and system administrators. We believe things should change. Cyber defense tools should not be merely watchers. They need to become doers - active fighters in maintaining a system's resilience against cyber threats. This means that their capabilities should include a significant degree of autonomy and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection · Information and Cyber Security · Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
