MICROSCOPE Mission scenario, ground segment and data processing

TL;DR

The paper details the MICROSCOPE mission's scenario, ground segment, and data processing methods used to test the Weak Equivalence Principle with high precision over multiple science sessions spanning 2.5 years.

Contribution

It describes the comprehensive data flow process and operational tradeoffs in executing the MICROSCOPE mission for fundamental physics testing.

Findings

Data collection over 2.5 years supports high-precision WEP testing.

Operational constraints influenced the science session scheduling.

Ground segment coordination enabled effective data processing.

Abstract

Testing the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) to a precision of $10^{-15}$ requires a quantity of data that give enough confidence on the final result: ideally, the longer the measurement the better the rejection of thestatistical noise. The science sessions had a duration of 120 orbits maximum and were regularly repeated and spaced out to accommodate operational constraints but also in order to repeat the experiment in different conditions and to allow time to calibrate the instrument. Several science sessions were performed over the 2.5 year duration of the experiment. This paper aims to describe how the data have been produced on the basis of a mission scenario and a data flow process, driven by a tradeoff between the science objectives and the operational constraints. The mission was led by the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) which provided the satellite, the launch and the ground operations. The ground segment was distributed between CNES and Office National d'Etudes et de Recherches A\'erospatiales (ONERA). CNES provided the raw data through the Centre d'Expertise de Compensation de Tra\^{i}n\'{e}e (CECT: Drag-free expertise centre). The science was led by the Observatoire de la C\^ote d{'}Azur (OCA) and ONERA was in charge of the data process. The latter also provided the instrument and the Science Mission Centre of MICROSCOPE (CMSM).