Many Worlds are irrelevant for the problem of the arrow of time
Veronika Baumann, Flavio Del Santo

TL;DR
This paper critiques Gao's claim that only the many worlds interpretation explains the arrow of time, arguing that his reasoning is flawed and could hinder scientific explanations.
Contribution
It refutes Gao's argument, demonstrating that the many worlds interpretation is not uniquely necessary for explaining the arrow of time.
Findings
Gao's argument is untenable
The many worlds interpretation is not the only explanation
Potential implications for scientific explanations of time's arrow
Abstract
In a recent paper, S. Gao has claimed that, under the assumption that the initial state of the universe is a pure quantum state, only the many worlds interpretation can account for the observed arrow of time. We show that his argument is untenable and that if endorsed it potentially leads to undermine the search for a scientific explanation of certain phenomena.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
