The California-Kepler Survey. X. The Radius Gap as a Function of Stellar Mass, Metallicity, and Age

TL;DR

This study expands the California-Kepler Survey data to include lower-mass stars, revealing how the Radius Gap and sub-Neptune sizes depend on stellar mass, with implications for planetary formation and evolution models.

Contribution

It provides new data on stars with 0.5-0.8 M_sun, analyzing the Radius Gap's dependence on stellar properties and testing theoretical models of planetary mass loss.

Findings

Radius Gap follows Rp ∝ P^m with m ≈ -0.10, consistent with mass-loss theories.

Average sub-Neptune size increases with stellar mass, Rp ∝ M_star^0.25.

No significant correlation between sub-Neptune size and stellar metallicity or age.

Abstract

In 2017, the California-Kepler Survey (CKS) published its first data release (DR1) of high-resolution optical spectra of 1305 planet hosts. Refined CKS planet radii revealed that small planets are bifurcated into two distinct populations: super-Earths (smaller than 1.5 $R_E$) and sub-Neptunes (between 2.0 and 4.0 $R_E$), with few planets in between (the "Radius Gap.") Several theoretical models of the Radius Gap predict variation with stellar mass, but testing these predictions are challenging with CKS DR1 due to its limited $M_\star$ range of 0.8-1.4 $M_\odot$. Here, we present CKS DR2 with 411 additional spectra and derived properties focusing on stars of 0.5-0.8 $M_\odot$. We found the Radius Gap follows $R_p \propto P^m$ with $m = -0.10 \pm 0.03$, consistent with predictions of XUV- and core-powered mass-loss mechanisms. We found no evidence that $m$ varies with $M_\star$. We observed a correlation between the average sub-Neptune size and $M_\star$. Over 0.5 to 1.4 $M_\odot$, the average sub-Neptune grows from 2.1 to 2.6 $R_E$, following $R_p \propto M_\star^\alpha$ with $\alpha = 0.25 \pm 0.03$. In contrast, there is no detectable change for super-Earths. These $M_\star$-$R_p$ trends suggests that protoplanetary disks can efficiently produce cores up to a threshold mass of $M_c$, which grows linearly with stellar mass according to $M_c \approx 10 M_E~(M_\star / M_\odot)$. There is no significant correlation between sub-Neptune size and stellar metallicity (over $-$0.5 to $+$0.5 dex) suggesting a weak relationship between planet envelope opacity and stellar metallicity. Finally, there is no significant variation in sub-Neptune size with stellar age (over 1 to 10 Gyr), which suggests that the majority of envelope contraction concludes after $\sim$1 Gyr.