Does the Helmholtz boundary element method suffer from the pollution effect?
Jeffrey Galkowski, Euan A. Spence

TL;DR
This paper proves that the $h$-version Galerkin boundary element method for the Helmholtz exterior Dirichlet problem does not suffer from the pollution effect in nontrapping obstacle scenarios, clarifying its efficiency at high frequencies.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous proof that the $h$-BEM avoids pollution effects for nontrapping obstacles, unlike the well-understood $h$-FEM.
Findings
The $h$-BEM does not suffer from pollution in nontrapping cases.
Theoretical bounds on degrees of freedom growth with frequency.
Clarification of BEM efficiency at high frequencies.
Abstract
In dimensions, accurately approximating an arbitrary function oscillating with frequency requires degrees of freedom. A numerical method for solving the Helmholtz equation (with wavenumber and in dimensions) suffers from the pollution effect if, as , the total number of degrees of freedom needed to maintain accuracy grows faster than this natural threshold (i.e., faster than for domain-based formulations, such as finite element methods, and for boundary-based formulations, such as boundary element methods). It is well known that the -version of the finite element method (FEM) (where accuracy is increased by decreasing the meshwidth and keeping the polynomial degree fixed) suffers from the pollution effect, and research over the last 30 years has resulted in a near-complete rigorous understanding of how…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis · Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods · Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
