The earliest O-type eclipsing binary in the Small Magellanic Cloud, AzV 476: A comprehensive analysis reveals surprisingly low stellar masses
D. Pauli, L. M. Oskinova, W.-R. Hamann, V. Ramachandran, H. Todt, A., A. C. Sander, T. Shenar, M. Rickard, J. Ma\'iz Apell\'aniz, R. Prinja

TL;DR
This study provides a detailed analysis of the earliest O-type eclipsing binary in the Small Magellanic Cloud, revealing surprisingly low stellar masses and insights into binary evolution at low metallicity.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive multi-method analysis of AzV 476, including spectroscopic, photometric, and evolutionary modeling, highlighting the importance of binary evolution in low-metallicity massive stars.
Findings
Both stars have similar masses (~20 M$_{\odot}$).
The primary has lost about half its initial mass.
Binary evolution with mass transfer explains current parameters.
Abstract
Massive stars at low metallicity are among the main feedback agents in the early Universe and in present-day star forming galaxies. When in binaries, these stars are potential progenitors of gravitational-wave events. Knowledge of stellar masses is a prerequisite to understanding evolution and feedback of low-metallicity massive stars. Using abundant spectroscopic and photometric measurements of an outstandingly bright eclipsing binary, we compare its dynamic, spectroscopic, and evolutionary mass estimates and develop a binary evolution scenario. We comprehensively studied the eclipsing binary system, AzV 476, in the Small Magellanic Cloud. The light curve and radial velocities were analyzed to obtain the orbital parameters. The photometric and spectroscopic data in the UV and optical were analyzed using the Potsdam Wolf-Rayet model atmospheres. The obtained results are interpreted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
