Maker-Breaker games on $ K_{\omega_1}$ and $K_{\omega,\omega_1}$
Nathan Bowler, Florian Gut, Attila Jo\'o, Max Pitz

TL;DR
This paper studies Maker-Breaker positional games on uncountably large graphs, showing that the existence of winning strategies depends heavily on the underlying set-theoretic axioms.
Contribution
It establishes the dependence of Maker-Breaker game outcomes on different axiomatic frameworks, especially involving ZFC, CH, MA, and AD.
Findings
Maker wins under ZFC+MA+¬CH for K_{ω,ω₁}
Breaker wins under ZFC+CH for K_{ω,ω₁}
Maker wins under ZF+DC+AD for K_{ω₁}
Abstract
We investigate Maker-Breaker games on graphs of size in which Maker's goal is to build a copy of the host graph. We establish a firm dependence of the outcome of the game on the axiomatic framework. Relating to this, we prove that there is a winning strategy for Maker in the -game under ZFC+MA+CH and a winning strategy for Breaker under ZFC+CH. We prove a similar result for the -game. Here, Maker has a winning strategy under ZF+DC+AD, while Breaker has one under ZFC+CH again.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
