The half mass radius of MaNGA galaxies: Effect of IMF gradients

TL;DR

This study investigates how stellar population gradients, especially in the IMF, affect measurements of galaxy sizes and masses in MaNGA galaxies, revealing significant impacts on inferred galaxy evolution.

Contribution

It introduces a method to quantify the impact of IMF-driven stellar population gradients on galaxy size and mass estimates, highlighting their importance in galaxy evolution studies.

Findings

IMF gradients cause larger $M_*/L$ in galaxy centers

Size estimates $R_{e,*}$ are significantly affected by IMF gradients

Galaxy size-mass relation shifts when gradients are considered

Abstract

Gradients in the stellar populations (SP) of galaxies -- e.g., in age, metallicity, stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) -- can result in gradients in the stellar mass to light ratio, $M_*/L$. Such gradients imply that the distribution of the stellar mass and light are different. For old SPs, e.g., in early-type galaxies at $z\sim 0$, the $M_*/L$ gradients are weak if driven by variations in age and metallicity, but significantly larger if driven by the IMF. A gradient which has larger $M_*/L$ in the center increases the estimated total stellar mass ($M_*$) and reduces the scale which contains half this mass ($R_{e,*}$), compared to when the gradient is ignored. For the IMF gradients inferred from fitting MILES simple SP models to the H$_\beta$, $\langle$Fe$\rangle$, [MgFe] and TiO$_{\rm 2SDSS}$ absorption lines measured in spatially resolved spectra of early-type galaxies in the MaNGA survey, the fractional change in $R_{e,*}$ can be significantly larger than that in $M_*$, especially when the light is more centrally concentrated. The $R_{e,*}-M_*$ correlation which results is offset by 0.3 dex to smaller sizes compared to when these gradients are ignored. Comparisons with `quiescent' galaxies at higher-$z$ must account for evolution in SP gradients (especially age and IMF) and the light profile before drawing conclusions about how $R_{e,*}$ and $M_*$ evolve. The implied merging between higher-$z$ and the present is less contrived if $R_{e,*}/R_e$ at $z\sim 0$ is closer to our IMF-driven gradient calibration than to unity.