Momentum distributions of cosmic relics: Improved analysis
Kalle Ala-Mattinen, Matti Heikinheimo, Kimmo Kainulainen, Kimmo, Tuominen

TL;DR
This paper develops a precise numerical method to analyze the momentum distributions of cosmic relic particles, improving upon previous approximations and testing it on dark matter models to assess distribution accuracy and relic density predictions.
Contribution
It introduces a coupled momentum-dependent Boltzmann equation solver that avoids common approximations, enabling more accurate modeling of cosmic relic particle distributions.
Findings
Kinetic equilibrium can hold near resonances, but may underestimate relic density by up to 40%.
Elastic interactions have negligible effects on sterile neutrino distributions.
The new method provides more precise relic density calculations for dark matter models.
Abstract
We solve coupled momentum-dependent Boltzmann equations for the phase space distribution of cosmic relic particles, without resorting to approximations of assuming kinetic equilibrium or neglecting backscattering or elastic interactions. Our method is amendable to precision numerical computations. To test it, we consider two benchmark models where the momentum dependence of dark matter distribution function is potentially important: a real singlet scalar extension near the Higgs resonance and a sterile neutrino dark matter model with a singlet scalar mediator. The singlet scalar example shows that the kinetic equilibrium may hold surprisingly well even near sharp resonances. However, the integrated method may underestimate the relic density by up to 40% in extreme cases. In the sterile neutrino dark matter model, we studied how the inclusion of previously ignored elastic interactions…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
