Electrical conductance of charged nanopores
Yoav Green

TL;DR
This paper investigates how surface charge regulation, convection, and slip-lengths influence the electrical conductance of charged nanopores, revealing that combined effects can produce a wide range of conductance concentration dependencies.
Contribution
It demonstrates that considering convection and slip-lengths explains the experimentally observed variability in conductance slopes, extending understanding of nanopore electrokinetics.
Findings
Convection does not change the conductance slope.
Slip-lengths double the conductance slope.
All effects combined allow the slope to vary between 0 and 1.
Abstract
A nanopores's response to an electrical potential drop is characterized by its electrical conductance, \tilde{G}. It has long been thought that at low concentrations, the conductance is independent of the electrolyte concentration, \tilde{c}_0, such that \tilde{G} ~ \tilde{c}_0^0. It has been recently demonstrated that surface charge regulation changes the dependency to be \tilde{G} ~ \tilde{c}_0^{\alpha} where the slope typically takes the values \alpha = 1/3 or 1/2. Yet, experiments have observed slopes of 2/3 and 1 suggesting that additional mechanisms, such as convection and slip-lengths, appear. We show that the inclusion of convection doesn't vary the slope, while the inclusion of a slip length doubles the slope value. Here, we elucidate the interplay between surface charge regulation, convection, and slip-lengths. We show that when all effects are accounted for \alpha can take…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
