X-ray burst and persistent emission properties of the magnetar SGR 1830-0645 in outburst

TL;DR

This study presents detailed X-ray and radio observations of the magnetar SGR 1830-0645 during its outburst, revealing evolving surface hotspots, pulse shape changes, and a correlation between burst activity and surface emission, with no detected radio emission.

Contribution

First comprehensive monitoring of SGR 1830-0645's outburst with precise timing, spectral analysis, and burst localization, providing new insights into magnetar surface activity and emission mechanisms.

Findings

Surface hotspots shrank during decay

Burst activity concentrated near surface emission peaks

No radio emission detected despite X-ray bursts

Abstract

We report on NICER X-ray monitoring of the magnetar SGR 1830-0645 covering 223 days following its October 2020 outburst, as well as Chandra and radio observations. We present the most accurate spin ephemerides of the source so far: $\nu=0.096008680(2)$~Hz, $\dot{\nu}=-6.2(1)\times10^{-14}$~Hz~s$^{-1}$, and a significant second and third frequency derivative terms indicative of non-negligible timing noise. The phase-averaged 0.8--7~keV spectrum is well fit with a double-blackbody (BB) model throughout the campaign. The BB temperatures remain constant at 0.46 and 1.2 keV. The areas and flux of each component decreased by a factor of 6, initially through a steep decay trend lasting about 46 days followed by a shallow long-term one. The pulse shape in the same energy range is initially complex, exhibiting three distinct peaks, yet with clear continuous evolution throughout the outburst towards a simpler, single-pulse shape. The rms pulsed fraction is high and increases from about 40% to 50%. We find no dependence of pulse shape or fraction on energy. These results suggest that multiple hotspots, possibly possessing temperature gradients, emerged at outburst-onset, and shrank as the outburst decayed. We detect 84 faint bursts with \nicer, having a strong preference for occurring close to the surface emission pulse maximum the first time this phenomenon is detected in such a large burst sample. This likely implies a very low altitude for the burst emission region, and a triggering mechanism connected to the surface active zone. Finally, our radio observations at several epochs and multiple frequencies reveal no evidence of pulsed or burst-like radio emission.