A causal model of safety assurance for machine learning
Simon Burton

TL;DR
This paper introduces a causal model-based framework for safety assurance in machine learning, integrating safety engineering principles and structured evidence analysis to improve safety argumentation.
Contribution
It presents a novel causal modeling framework for ML safety assurance, including evidence categorization and structured analysis methods, advancing safety argumentation practices.
Findings
Framework effectively structures safety evidence for ML applications
Formalizations illustrate causal relationships and safety contributions
Proposes future research directions for safety assurance in ML
Abstract
This paper proposes a framework based on a causal model of safety upon which effective safety assurance cases for ML-based applications can be built. In doing so, we build upon established principles of safety engineering as well as previous work on structuring assurance arguments for ML. The paper defines four categories of safety case evidence and a structured analysis approach within which these evidences can be effectively combined. Where appropriate, abstract formalisations of these contributions are used to illustrate the causalities they evaluate, their contributions to the safety argument and desirable properties of the evidences. Based on the proposed framework, progress in this area is re-evaluated and a set of future research directions proposed in order for tangible progress in this field to be made.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSafety Systems Engineering in Autonomy · Risk and Safety Analysis · Software Reliability and Analysis Research
