A polyconvex transversely-isotropic invariant-based formulation for electro-mechanics: stability, minimisers and computational implementation
M. Hor\'ak, A. J. Gil, R. Ortigosa, M. Kru\v{z}\'ik

TL;DR
This paper develops a new polyconvex invariant-based model for simulating transversely isotropic electro-active polymers, enabling stable large-strain analysis and capturing complex 3D actuation behaviors including wrinkling.
Contribution
It introduces a novel polyconvex invariant-based framework for anisotropic EAPs, extending previous isotropic models and ensuring stability and existence of minimisers at large strains.
Findings
Model captures large deformation behaviors of EAPs under electric fields.
Numerical examples demonstrate influence of anisotropy and deformation on response.
Framework predicts phenomena like wrinkling during actuation.
Abstract
The fabrication of evermore sophisticated miniaturised soft robotic components made up of Electro-Active Polymers (EAPs) is constantly demanding parallel development from the in-silico simulation point of view. The incorporation of crystallographic anisotropic micro-architectures, within an otherwise nearly uniform isotropic soft polymer matrix, has shown great potential in terms of advanced three-dimensional actuation (i.e. stretching, bending, twisting), especially at large strains, that is, beyond the onset of geometrical pull-in instabilities. To accommodate for this in-silico response, this paper presents a phenomenological invariant-based polyconvex transversely isotropic framework for the simulation of EAPs at large strains. This research expands previous work developed by Gil and Ortigosa for isotropic EAPs with the help of the pioneering work by Schr\"{o}eder and Neff in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
