The free energy of a box-version of the interacting Bose gas

TL;DR

This paper introduces a simplified box-version of the interacting Bose gas model, deriving an explicit variational formula for its free energy and analyzing phase transition properties without proving its existence.

Contribution

It provides a new variational formula for the free energy of a simplified Bose gas model using a large-deviation approach and explicit particle organization.

Findings

Explicit variational formula for free energy

Properties of free energy as a function of density

Qualitative phase transition behavior

Abstract

The interacting quantum Bose gas is a random ensemble of many Brownian bridges (cycles) of various lengths with interactions between any pair of legs of the cycles. It is one of the standard mathematical models in which a proof for the famous Bose-Einstein condensation phase transition is sought for. We introduce a simplified version of the model with an organisation of the particles in deterministic boxes instead of Brownian cycles as the marks of a reference Poisson point process (for simplicity, in $\mathbb Z^d$ instead of $\mathbb R^d$). We derive an explicit and interpretable variational formula in the thermodynamic limit for the limiting free energy of the canonical ensemble for any value of the particle density. This formula features all relevant physical quantities of the model, like the microscopic and the macroscopic particle densities, together with their mutual and self-energies and their entropies. The proof method comprises a two-step large-deviation approach for marked Poisson point processes and an explicit distinction into small and large marks. In the characteristic formula, each of the microscopic particles and the statistics of the macroscopic part of the configuration are seen explicitly; the latter receives the interpretation of the condensate. The formula enables us to prove a number of properties of the limiting free energy as a function of the particle density, like differentiability and explicit upper and lower bounds, and a qualitative picture below and above the critical threshold (if it is finite). This proves a modified saturation nature of the phase transition. However, we have not yet succeeded in proving the existence of this phase transition.