Comparison between core-collapse supernova nucleosynthesis and meteoric stardust grains: investigating magnesium, aluminium, and chromium
Jacqueline den Hartogh, Maria K. Pet\"o, Thomas Lawson, Andre, Sieverding, Hannah Brinkman, Marco Pignatari, and Maria Lugaro

TL;DR
This study investigates whether core-collapse supernovae can produce the isotopic variations observed in meteoritic stardust grains, focusing on magnesium, aluminium, and chromium isotopes, and compares model yields with meteoritic data.
Contribution
The paper provides detailed CCSN nucleosynthesis models for stars of 15, 20, and 25 solar masses, linking supernova yields to meteoritic isotope anomalies, especially for chromium, magnesium, and aluminium.
Findings
Explosive C-ashes can reproduce observed Cr isotope ratios.
He ashes enriched in Al and Cr match Mg-Cr anomaly correlations.
Mg isotope variations are dominated by stable isotopes, not Al.
Abstract
Isotope variations of nucleosynthetic origin among Solar System's solid samples are well documented, yet the origin of these variations is still uncertain. The observed variability of \iso{54}Cr among materials formed in different regions of the proto-planetary disk has been attributed to variable amounts of presolar chromium-rich oxide (chromite) grains, which exist within the meteoritic stardust inventory and most likely originated from some type of supernova explosions. To investigate if core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) could be the site of origin of these grains, we analyse yields of CCSN models of stars with initial mass 15, 20 and 25 M, and solar metallicity. We present an extensive abundance data set of the Cr, Mg, and Al isotopes as a function of enclosed mass. We find cases in which the explosive C-ashes produce a composition in good agreement with the observed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
