The atmosphere and architecture of WASP-189 b probed by its CHEOPS phase curve
A. Deline, M. J. Hooton, M. Lendl, B. Morris, S. Salmon, G. Olofsson,, C. Broeg, D. Ehrenreich, M. Beck, A. Brandeker, S. Hoyer, S. Sulis, V. Van, Grootel, V. Bourrier, O. Demangeon, B.-O. Demory, K. Heng, H. Parviainen, L., M. Serrano, V. Singh, A. Bonfanti, L. Fossati

TL;DR
This study uses CHEOPS photometry to analyze the atmosphere and system architecture of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-189 b, revealing its size, orbit, and thermal properties with high precision.
Contribution
It presents a detailed modeling of the asymmetric transit caused by the host star's gravity darkening and constrains the planet's atmospheric characteristics, including albedo and thermal emission.
Findings
Measured planet radius with 1% precision
Determined the orbital obliquity to be nearly polar
Set an upper limit on the geometric albedo at 0.48
Abstract
Gas giants orbiting close to hot and massive early-type stars can reach dayside temperatures that are comparable to those of the coldest stars. These "ultra-hot Jupiters" have atmospheres made of ions and atomic species from molecular dissociation and feature strong day-to-night temperature gradients. Photometric observations at different orbital phases provide insights on the planet atmospheric properties. We analyse the photometric observations of WASP-189 acquired with the instrument CHEOPS to derive constraints on the system architecture and the planetary atmosphere. We implement a light curve model suited for asymmetric transit shape caused by the gravity-darkened photosphere of the fast-rotating host star. We also model the reflective and thermal components of the planetary flux, the effect of stellar oblateness and light-travel time on transit-eclipse timings, the stellar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
