Differentiating Geographic Movement Described in Text Documents
Scott Pezanowski, Alan M. MacEachren, Prasenjit Mitra

TL;DR
This paper explores the challenges of interpreting geographic movement in text documents and identifies key characteristics used by humans to differentiate movement descriptions, providing insights for computational analysis.
Contribution
It offers an empirical study on how humans interpret movement in text and provides recommendations for improving computational understanding of such descriptions.
Findings
Humans use multiple characteristics to differentiate movement descriptions.
Interpreting movement in text is complicated by spatial terms and temporal references.
Recommendations for computational analysis of movement in text are provided.
Abstract
Understanding movement described in text documents is important since text descriptions of movement contain a wealth of geographic and contextual information about the movement of people, wildlife, goods, and much more. Our research makes several contributions to improve our understanding of movement descriptions in text. First, we show how interpreting geographic movement described in text is challenging because of general spatial terms, linguistic constructions that make the thing(s) moving unclear, and many types of temporal references and groupings, among others. Next, as a step to overcome these challenges, we report on an experiment with human subjects through which we identify multiple important characteristics of movement descriptions (found in text) that humans use to differentiate one movement description from another. Based on our empirical results, we provide recommendations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
