Comparative evaluation of the web-based contiguous cartogram generation tool go-cart.io
Ian K. Duncan, Michael T. Gastner

TL;DR
This study compares two web-based contiguous cartogram tools, evaluating their usability and features, and provides recommendations to improve user experience for non-technical users.
Contribution
It offers a comparative analysis of go-cart.io and fBlog, including usability evaluation and suggestions for enhancing web-based cartogram tools.
Findings
go-cart.io is more usable than fBlog according to user ratings
go-cart.io offers more map options and data import features
both tools have usability issues due to complex interfaces
Abstract
Area cartograms are map-based data visualizations in which the area of each map region is proportional to the data value it represents. Long utilized in print media, area cartograms have also become increasingly popular online, often accompanying news articles and blog posts. Despite their popularity, there is a dearth of cartogram generation tools accessible to non-technical users unfamiliar with Geographic Information Systems software. Few tools support the generation of contiguous cartograms (i.e., area cartograms that faithfully represent the spatial adjacency of neighboring regions). We thus reviewed existing contiguous cartogram software and compared two web-based cartogram tools: fBlog and go-cart.io. We experimentally evaluated their usability through a user study comprising cartogram generation and analysis tasks. The System Usability Scale was adopted to quantify how…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeographic Information Systems Studies · Data Management and Algorithms · Data Visualization and Analytics
