
TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of considering human factors and user decision-making archetypes in AI deployment to mitigate unsafe outcomes and enhance overall AI safety.
Contribution
It introduces a holistic approach to AI safety that incorporates human-AI interaction and user decision-making archetypes during deployment.
Findings
User decision-making archetypes influence AI safety outcomes
Designing for human factors can reduce unsafe AI incidents
Real-world scenarios highlight the need for holistic risk mitigation
Abstract
AI-based systems have been used widely across various industries for different decisions ranging from operational decisions to tactical and strategic ones in low- and high-stakes contexts. Gradually the weaknesses and issues of these systems have been publicly reported including, ethical issues, biased decisions, unsafe outcomes, and unfair decisions, to name a few. Research has tended to optimize AI less has focused on its risk and unexpected negative consequences. Acknowledging this serious potential risks and scarcity of re-search I focus on unsafe outcomes of AI. Specifically, I explore this issue from a Human-AI interaction lens during AI deployment. It will be discussed how the interaction of individuals and AI during its deployment brings new concerns, which need a solid and holistic mitigation plan. It will be dis-cussed that only AI algorithms' safety is not enough to make its…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
