Subgoal-Based Explanations for Unreliable Intelligent Decision Support Systems
Devleena Das, Been Kim, Sonia Chernova

TL;DR
This paper introduces subgoal-based explanations for decision support systems, enhancing user understanding and robustness when the system provides incorrect recommendations or fails.
Contribution
It proposes a novel explanation type that highlights subgoals, improving user performance and trust in non-robust IDS systems.
Findings
Subgoal explanations improve user task performance.
Users better distinguish between correct and incorrect recommendations.
Subgoal explanations are preferred by users.
Abstract
Intelligent decision support (IDS) systems leverage artificial intelligence techniques to generate recommendations that guide human users through the decision making phases of a task. However, a key challenge is that IDS systems are not perfect, and in complex real-world scenarios may produce incorrect output or fail to work altogether. The field of explainable AI planning (XAIP) has sought to develop techniques that make the decision making of sequential decision making AI systems more explainable to end-users. Critically, prior work in applying XAIP techniques to IDS systems has assumed that the plan being proposed by the planner is always optimal, and therefore the action or plan being recommended as decision support to the user is always correct. In this work, we examine novice user interactions with a non-robust IDS system -- one that occasionally recommends the wrong action, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Forecasting Techniques and Applications
