On proof theory in computational complexity: overview
L. Gordeev, E.H. Haeusler

TL;DR
This paper provides an overview of novel proof-theoretic techniques used to establish the equalities NP = coNP = PSPACE, highlighting the compression methods applied to natural deduction and sequent calculus.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive overview of proof-theoretic tree-to-dag compression techniques for propositional minimal logic, leading to significant complexity class equalities.
Findings
Proved NP = coNP = PSPACE using proof compression methods
Developed novel proof-theoretic tree-to-dag techniques
Applied to natural deduction and sequent calculus
Abstract
In [GH1] and [GH2] (see also [GH3]) we presented full proof of the equalities NP = coNP = PSPACE. These results have been obtained by the novel proof theoretic tree-to-dag compressing techniques adapted to Prawitz's Natural Deduction (ND) for propositional minimal logic coupled with the corresponding Hudelmaier's cutfree sequent calculus. In this paper we propose an overview of our proofs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · semigroups and automata theory · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
