Structural measures of similarity and complementarity in complex networks
Szymon Talaga, Andrzej Nowak

TL;DR
This paper introduces new measures of structural similarity and complementarity in complex networks, linking motifs to these principles and demonstrating their effectiveness in social and biological contexts.
Contribution
It proposes two families of coefficients capturing similarity and complementarity, linking them to network motifs, and provides algorithms and a Python package for their computation.
Findings
Coefficients distinguish different social relations.
They measure structural diversity in PPI networks.
Complementarity explains some relations better than homophily.
Abstract
The principle of similarity, or homophily, is often used to explain patterns observed in complex networks such as transitivity and the abundance of triangles (3-cycles). However, many phenomena from division of labor to protein-protein interactions (PPI) are driven by complementarity (differences and synergy). Here we show that the principle of complementarity is linked to the abundance of quadrangles (4-cycles) and dense bipartite-like subgraphs. We link both principles to their characteristic motifs and introduce two families of coefficients of: (1) structural similarity, which generalize local clustering and closure coefficients and capture the full spectrum of similarity-driven structures; (2) structural complementarity, defined analogously but based on quadrangles instead of triangles. Using multiple social and biological networks, we demonstrate that the coefficients capture…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
