Easy confidence interval formulas for network meta-analysis and adjustment of confidence intervals for a small number of studies
Masahiro Kojima

TL;DR
This paper introduces simple confidence interval formulas for network meta-analysis and proposes Bartlett-type and bootstrap adjustments to improve accuracy, especially with small study numbers, validated through simulations.
Contribution
It develops new Bartlett-type adjustment methods for both maximum likelihood and restricted maximum likelihood estimators in network meta-analysis.
Findings
Adjusted confidence intervals maintain nominal confidence levels.
Likelihood ratio-based intervals perform well without bootstrap.
Adjustments are effective in actual network meta-analysis scenarios.
Abstract
We propose simple formulas of confidence intervals for the Wald statistic, likelihood ratio statistic, and score statistic for a network meta-analysis. In addition, we consider resolutions for concerns that network meta-analyses with a small number of studies cannot hold a nominal confidence level. For a bias adjustment in analyses with a small number of studies, a Bartlett-type adjustment is a well-known method. Many Bartlett-type adjustment-type methods are based on maximum likelihood estimators. However, the network meta-analysis often uses the restricted maximum likelihood estimators that have not been extensively discussed in Bartlett-type adjustment. In this paper, we propose a Bartlett-type adjustment method for the Wald statistic, likelihood ratio statistic, and score statistic when nuisance parameters are estimated by not only the maximum likelihood method but also the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDiverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
