Uncovering the Source of Machine Bias
Xiyang Hu, Yan Huang, Beibei Li, Tian Lu

TL;DR
This paper develops a structural econometric model to identify and quantify gender biases in human evaluators' decisions on a micro-lending platform, showing biases favor female applicants and how removing them improves profits and reduces gender gaps.
Contribution
It introduces a novel econometric approach to uncover and simulate the effects of gender biases in lending decisions, and compares human biases with machine learning mitigation strategies.
Findings
Biases favor female applicants in lending decisions.
Removing biases increases company profits.
Machine learning can mitigate evaluator biases.
Abstract
We develop a structural econometric model to capture the decision dynamics of human evaluators on an online micro-lending platform, and estimate the model parameters using a real-world dataset. We find two types of biases in gender, preference-based bias and belief-based bias, are present in human evaluators' decisions. Both types of biases are in favor of female applicants. Through counterfactual simulations, we quantify the effect of gender bias on loan granting outcomes and the welfare of the company and the borrowers. Our results imply that both the existence of the preference-based bias and that of the belief-based bias reduce the company's profits. When the preference-based bias is removed, the company earns more profits. When the belief-based bias is removed, the company's profits also increase. Both increases result from raising the approval probability for borrowers, especially…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHousing Market and Economics · Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
