
TL;DR
This empirical study analyzes how small orders impact markets, revealing that impact can be linear or concave depending on the instrument, and proposes a simple model for estimating market impact based on microstructure principles.
Contribution
It introduces a straightforward, linear impact model applicable across various instruments, based on empirical analysis of order book events and microstructure reasoning.
Findings
Impact varies between linear and concave functions of volume.
Normalized impact patterns are consistent across different instruments.
Proposed model provides satisfactory estimates for different impact volume dependencies.
Abstract
The article is an empirical study of market impact through order book events. It describes a mechanism of extracting an average participation rate and a market impact of small orders which represent individual slices of large metaorders. The study is based on tick data for futures contracts. It is shown that the impact could be either linear or a concave function as a function of trading volume, depending on the instrument. After normalisation, this dependency is shown to be very similar for a wide range of instruments. A simple yet effective model for market impact estimation is proposed. This model is linear in nature and is derived based on straightforward microstructure reasoning. The estimation shows satisfactory results for both concave and linear market impact volume dependencies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Reporting and Valuation Research · Firm Innovation and Growth · Corporate Finance and Governance
