A study on bribery networks with a focus on harassment bribery and ways to control corruption
Chanchal Pramanik

TL;DR
This paper analyzes bribery networks with a focus on harassment bribery, highlighting how asymmetric punishment and detection probabilities can help control corruption.
Contribution
It introduces a model emphasizing harassment bribery within networks and suggests that asymmetric punishment can improve detection and reduce corruption.
Findings
Asymmetric punishment increases harassment bribery detection probability
Colluding behavior sustains persistent corruption
Enhanced detection probabilities can control bribery networks
Abstract
The paper focuses on the bribery network emphasizing harassment bribery. A bribery network ends with the police officer whose utility from the bribe is positive and the approving officer in the network. The persistent nature of corruption is due to colluding behavior of the bribery networks. The probability of detection of bribery incidents will help in improving controlling corruption in society. The asymmetric form of punishment and award equivalent to the amount of punishment to the network can enhance the probability of detection of harassment bribery and thus increasing the probability of detection of overall bribery .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCorruption and Economic Development
